Watermark.
Lima BOSC
Switch site 38 sites · 11 basins 8 open

Each site is one Watermark investigation. The page color says what opens; the campus line is the build on the ground — two different clocks.

MAU Maumee Basin 9 sites
2MI The Two Miamis 9 sites
SE Southeastern Basins 12 sites
NE Northeast Basins 8 sites
The page — what opens on Watermark Open · Draftfull record Queued · Watchingpreview page Restrictedrequest access
The campus — the build on the ground Investigating Confirmed Under construction Operational
All 38 sites — the network index →
Building

The fiscal trade

What tax revenue is being traded away, for how long, and what the paper trail says.

Gap
  • no fiscal accounting and no incentive instrument is on the record

A fiscal trade is normally decided before it is studied, because the body that approves an abatement votes on a schedule the analysis never has to meet. This chapter shows the shape of the analysis a real study would carry. Each of the four questions below waits on a specific public record, and this study reports only the ones produced into it.

What tax revenue is abated, and at what percentage? [open]
Answered by the enterprise-zone / CRA agreement.
What does the school district forgo, and was it compensated? [open]
Answered by the school-board resolution and any compensation agreement.
What payment-in-lieu schedule replaces the abated tax, if any? [open]
Answered by the PILOT schedule in the agreement.
When does the community break even on the trade? [open]
Answered by the county auditor's annual abatement report.
Reading this chapter · Lima · updated 2026-08-02

Lima is the network’s proof that the four blanks above are not rhetorical. It is also the site where two of them have since been partly answered. Read this note against the panel below rather than instead of it.

What the record now shows

Allen County created Community Reinvestment Area No. 1 and approved a CRA agreement with Bistrozzi LLC by resolution 548-25doc , effective 2025-07-10. The county produced that agreement on 2026-06-05. It abates 75 % of real property tax for 15 years per building, and it covers buildings only. Equipment is personal property and sits outside it.

The company’s own estimates are written into the agreement as estimates, not as caps. They are about $500 million of capital investment and about 50 permanent full-time jobs by the end of 2030, against 0 employees at signing. The agreement records that actual figures may differ significantly.

The school side is on the record too, though at one remove. Elida Local School District’s board authorized a payment in lieu of taxes by resolution 5-25-2 on 2025-05-20, at $250,000 a year; the board’s own resolution has not been produced, and what carries the terms here is the CRA agreement that recites themdoc . The county’s separate resolution 494-25doc is the R.C. 3735.671 notice to that board and to Apollo Career Center, the joint vocational district in the same footprint.

Who actually paid for the roads

The corridor roadwork is the item most often described loosely, so state it exactly. Under the Roadwork Development Agreementdoc , Bistrozzi LLC pays a one-time contribution of $14.5 million. Allen County accepts dedication of the roads and maintains them afterward. The Port Authority of Allen County is the named grantee for two anticipated public grants: the State of Ohio Roadwork Development (629) grant, and an Ohio Department of Development Jobs and Commerce grant.

There is a clause worth reading twice. Under §5.5, if the certified total cost comes in below the company’s contribution plus the grant funds, the Authority refunds the difference to the company. Grant money received after itemization is refunded the same way. So public grant dollars can flow back to the private contributor. The real public-private split therefore turns on grant awards that this document does not contain.

What is still missing

The sales-tax side is not a county instrument at all. Ohio’s data-center exemption runs under R.C. 122.175 and is granted by the state. Whether this campus holds one is not in the record, so every sales-tax figure in the ledger annex is a conditional band, not a documented give.

The county performed a cost-benefit analysis behind this decision, because the county refers to it. A public-records request asked for it as item 4. The county withheld it, and the leads board tracks that withholding as PRR-04. The agreement tells you the terms of the trade. Only the withheld analysis tells you whether anyone checked that it was a good one.

The record behind this chapter

What this chapter stands on: the records it reads, the inputs its modeled figures rest on, and the reference data behind its baselines — the same pages the record screens serve, not a second copy. A figure the record does not support stays [open] and links nothing.

Cited by name
Record groups this chapter reads