Hydrology — water balance
Each scenario screens the Town Creek's low-flow capacity against the campus's consumptive cooling draw: live flow minus consumptive loss against the 7Q10 design low flow, and the assimilative headroom that remains. Live gauge and permit figures are grounded; scenario draws are labelled assumptions.
baseline
Consumptive lossmodeled
0cfs
0 MGD x 0 consumptive (scenario baseline)
[inference]
Town Creek 7Q10grounded
0.16cfs
Ohio EPA NPDES fact sheet 2PD00006 (Van Wert WWTP), Table 12 — USGS 04191500 (Auglaize River Near Defiance, 1915-2003) drainage area ratio applied to Town Creek
[verified]
Binding dilutiongrounded
0.03:1
Van Wert WWTP → Town Creek
[verified]
- no abstraction node configured for site 'van-wert'; the water balance omits the intake reach.
buildout
Load → cooling → water
500 MW (~349.7–500 MW) IT load
[inference] 0 MGD cooling makeup 0 cfs net consumptive The IT load is inferred from the facility's [verified] air-permit backup capacity (N+1), then carried through the cooling archetype's water math — one derivation, not two headlines. The disclosed MW range widens the consumptive bracket.
Consumptive lossmodeled
0cfs
0 MGD x 0 consumptive (scenario buildout)
[inference]
Town Creek 7Q10grounded
0.16cfs
Ohio EPA NPDES fact sheet 2PD00006 (Van Wert WWTP), Table 12 — USGS 04191500 (Auglaize River Near Defiance, 1915-2003) drainage area ratio applied to Town Creek
[verified]
Binding dilutiongrounded
0.03:1
Van Wert WWTP → Town Creek
[verified]
- no abstraction node configured for site 'van-wert'; the water balance omits the intake reach.