Record · Local legislation
City of Sidney Ordinance No. A-3227 — zoning the annexed Shelby County Commissioners tract in the southeast quarter of Section 3 as IIM, passed 2025-07-28
2025-07-28-ord-a-3227-zoning-53-acres-county
Fields
instrument
City of Sidney Ordinance No. A-3227 — zoning the annexed Shelby County Commissioners tract in the southeast quarter of Section 3 as IIM, passed 2025-07-28
ordinance_no
A-3227
body
Council of the City of Sidney, Ohio
body_kind
city_council
subject_matter
zoning_establishment
adopted
2025-07-28
outcome
approved
zoning_classification
IIM - Industry / Innovation / Manufacturing Zone
zoning_verbatim
be, and the same hereby is, zoned IIM - Industry / Innovation / Manufacturing Zone.
not_the_campus
- tag verified
- verbatim Situate in the southeast quaiter of Section 3, Town 7 Nmth, Range 6 East, Clinton Township, Shelby County, State of Ohio. Commencing at an iron pin in a monument box found at the southeast comer of the southeast quarter of Section 3. Said point also being at the centerline of Vandemark Road.
- note The campus is in the NORTH HALF of Section 3 (A-3225). The CRA expansion of Res. 69-25 covered both tracts, which is why the Council minutes of 2025-09-08 mention them together — that is not a reason to merge them. Journal artifacts ("quaiter", "Nmth", "comer") preserved.
⚠️_acreage_conflict_inside_one_instrument
- tag verified
- title AN ORDINANCE ZONING A 53.16 ACRE TRACT
- legal_description_closes Containing 53 .083 acres more or less, subject to all easements of record.
- section_2 amended to reflect the inclusion of the 5 3 .16-acre tract as an IIM - Industry / Innovation / Manufacturing Zone
- finding TWO FIGURES, ONE DOCUMENT, 0.077 ACRES APART. 53.083 is the only figure that ever appears inside a SURVEYED description; 53.16 appears in this ordinance's title and §2, in A-3211's title, in the Planning Commission's case caption for PRZM2025-0005, and in the Council minutes of 2025-09-08. Four City records divide on one tract.
- not_resolved [open]. The 0.077-acre difference is NOT explained by the roadway dedications shown on A-3211's exhibits (1.808 ac and 0.041 ac). Answered without being resolved.
planning_commission
- tag verified
- note Its zoning recommendation DEADLOCKED on 2025-06-16, case PRZM2025-0005 — "M. Asher- yes / P. Miller- no / A. Sakhalkar- no / D. Gross- yes" — which the clerk recorded as "Motion neither passed or failed". ⚠️ Quote that phrasing; do NOT restate a 2-2 tie as "failed". Neither of the two zoning recommendations put to the Commission that night carried.
vote
- roll_call_recorded no
- outcome_recorded no
- note [open] Instrument form only; the 2025-07-28 Council minutes are unpulled.
what_this_instrument_does_not_establish
- ANYTHING ABOUT THE AWS CAMPUS. Different tract, different owner, different quarter-section.
⚠ Gaps in the record
- Journal-scan artifacts throughout, preserved in quotation. The acreage conflict is in the instrument, not in the read.
Where it connects
sidney/council/2025-07-28-ord-a-3227-zoning-53-acres-county.resolution.yaml · p.1 · sidney